First, an apology: the fonts on this may be messed up on your screen. For whatever reason, I can't get them to save in anything other than micro type. I tried a few things, but haven't found a fix.
Cornmeal brownies? Seriously, yes. Although the concept may sound a little gross, they are actually pretty good. I found the recipe one day at Grit magazine's site. I adapted it a bit to make it a more conventional brownie recipe (black walnuts are okay for brownies; peanuts are not so much). I ended up with this:

1 stick of butter
1/2 c flour (I used white flour)
1/2 c cornmeal
1/2 tsp baking powder
1/4 tsp salt
4 eggs
1/2 tsp vanilla
1 c sugar
1/2 c brown sugar
1/2 c nuts (black walnut, but almost any other nut would be fine--and 1 c will also work with the same baking time as described below)

I mixed it all up and found that I had to bake it longer than the recipe suggested: I left it in for 40 minutes at 350 degrees.
This shows a cutaway view of the first pan (I have now made two)--the flavor is nice. There's definitely a texture of granularity because of the coarseness of the cornmeal, but what I tried tasted basically like brownies. Of course, the black walnuts may impact that, too, since they are fairly strongly-flavored. In the second batch, I used 1 cup of nuts and it worked well.
One other note is that I tried a new cooking fat to grease the dish beforehand: tallow. I'd read about it and wanted to try some, so hunted down a jar online. It's definitely pricier than the partially-hydrogenated lard I have been using.
When I opened the jar, I was greeted by a faint, unmistakable, and not necessarily welcome beefy aroma. It had a slight flavor to it, too. Crisco and processed lard are very neutral. I may have more to say about tallow in the future. It worked and it is no longer perceptible in the finished product.
Overall, this recipe has definite potential.
No comments:
Post a Comment